I'm not sure how to react today. They've made the conference finals, not the Cup final. Anything that looks too much like gloating is to be avoided, as there's a long way to go before the Sharks get a true chance at winning anything.
On the other hand: holy actual shit the Sharks have gone beyond the second round. I've never been here before with this team. I've only been around since 2006, remember, so I'm used to collapses in round 2, or utter meltdowns in round 1. People calling out Evgeni Nabokov. People who aren't Sharks fans pointing and laughing at Joe Thornton, and Sharks fans saying "well he might be playing hurt!" Endless column inches and fan chatter about how the eternal chokehold shows no sign of loosening and how everyone needs fired/traded/not offered a new contract/disowned/paraded through the streets wearing donkey ears.
Celebration is premature, but this is such a relief that I can't even tell you. The Thornton/Marleau/Heatley line turned up at the exact moment it needed to: when the Red Wings started keying on Pavelski/Setoguchi/Clowe, and oh man, isn't that nice? Sharks fans, isn't it nice to say that Joe Thornton has eight points in a playoff series? Three goals (one a game winner), five assists? It's awesome for the fans, but even more awesome for the big man himself.
I could wax rhapsodical about those people, and the made-of-bricks pairing of Dan Boyle and Douglas Murray (the question is irrelevant: the answer is Douglas Murray) on defence, and Nabby bouncing back from the game from hell. Nabby really worried me, I'll admit - after he took a little while to get his head around the now-infamous collapse of Team Russia against Canada in the Olympics I thought he might have a little trouble putting another awful game behind him, but if Thursday's blowout got to him, it didn't show last night. He was almost perfect.
Ahem, like I said, I could wax rhapsodic...
The fact remains though that there's still miles to go. At the moment Vancouver are running hot and cold more than the average sink, they could get hot again at a moment's notice, they could rebound in Chicago, that series could go the distance. Sharks could be sitting around an awful lot and historically doesn't do a team many favours. And choosing whether I'd prefer them to play Blackhawks and Canucks is impossible: there's no team in these playoffs that don't scare me. Nothing is assured. The conference finals are going to have some excellent hockey in them, but who will emerge from it is anyone's guess. The Sharks have nothing in the bag yet - but oh my, it's wonderful to be getting the chance to watch them try.
To go back a little: Vancouver staging any kind of comeback seems unlikely, I know, but the wonderful thing about these playoffs is that you can say something unlikely, point to the Habs, and instantly win an argument. "Montreal Canadiens" has become shorthand for "how the fuck did that happen?" and it's a wonderful thing. They're not supposed to be playing the Penguins. They weren't supposed to win any games against them, either. The clock might be ticking on this particular run, down 3-2 as they are, but even at that, what a hell of a thing it's been.
I have no particular affection or dislike for the Habs normally, although I do love their history and respect them as much as you can respect a team you don't support, but they've been a joy to watch. Everyone and their dog has mentioned Jaroslav Halak, but for good reason. He's in the form of his life, making saves that frankly shouldn't be possible. Of all the excellent goaltenders we've seen plying their trade so far this post-season, I'd argue Halak has been the most fun to watch.
Which leads me to this: A couple of weeks ago, I was guilty of a tirade against Hal Gill. I said he was going to be as much use as a chocolate fireguard. I have no idea why I said that, probably because I'm an idiot. He has been superb, and a Penguins matchup has been excellent for him: who better to know exactly how to cover Sidney Crosby than a guy who won a Cup with him?
This is a lot to do with why Sid hasn't been making an idiot of everyone on the other team as much lately. It isn't refereeing, it's defence. My only gripe about these playoffs is this official bashing for the wrong reasons. Let's get this clear: the referees are awful, but they are uniformly awful. They do not hate your team, they hate everyone. They are not in on a Bettman conspiracy, because they don't have the competence to be (and Bettman apparently can't run a league properly, so how is he going to pull off a conspiracy? Riddle me THAT). The officiating in San Jose's game two against Detroit was some kind of cosmic joke that pissed off both sets of fans, for example.
This is the other thing, though: can a team no longer lose because they weren't good enough to win? Does it always have to come down to refs? Sure, they're the common thread that unites us all in our fiery burning hate no matter which team we support, but c'mon. They're rubbish league-wide. They say good teams have to overcome adversity. Aren't incompetent stripey dudes just another hurdle, another thing not to lose your shit over? At this point, there's a pretty strong argument for that.
Sharks Gameday: A Change In Philosophy
2 hours ago
